![]() They are shielded, however, so don't worry about distorting your monitor's picture. If you have a small desk, then put it back and apart as much as possible. This will give the best imaging, I have found. Then place the satellites about two feet ahead and two feet apart, about 1/2 foot on either side of the monitor. This is only a 20W sub.įor positioning, place the sub in a corner, with the driver facing directly into the room. Depending on what music you listen to, you will have to adjust the sub's volume, but that is easy. I would recommend the Logitech speakers, as they offer a good balance between value and performance. With 4.1 and up, you can end up with improper imaging (because the music is normally coded in plain stereo, but there are exceptions), and echo issues depending on where you have the speakers set up. It has been my experience that 2.1 channels are the best for music. That means I am always seeking the best sound I can find (and afford). But you can always listen to them in stereo too. Two new formats for music, the SACD and the DVD-Audio are meant to be listened to using surround speakers (they have music recorded in 5.1 to them according to the taste of the artist, mixing engineer, etc.). 2 front, 2 rear, 1 left and 1 right, 1 center front and a subwoofer). 6.1 has an additional rear center and 7.1 ditches this rear centre to have 2 side sattelites (i.e. in front of you in between the two front speakers). Apart from the woofer, 4.1 consists of 2 front and 2 rear speakers and 5.1 adds to this a center front channel (which is a very good thing because normally the vocals in the music or the dialogues in movies are meant to played here i.e. 1 always means the subwoofer (the LFE channel). If you listen to stereo music through some sort of fancy surround setup, it'd be your system and its algorithm for upmixing the stereo to surround that does this for you and the results may be inferior to stereo itself.Ĥ.1 and 5.1 are surround setups. This is IMHO THE setup to have for listening to stereo music (if you have decent speakers that have no problem with reproducing the full bass range you can even ditch the subwoofer) because the music was meant to be listened to in this way IMHO. The subwoofer will only play the bass part of the sound (the lower frequencies) while the 2 others reproduce the other parts. Like I said, sound is a little too subjective for me to give you a hard-and-fast recommendation-especially since I use my sound mostly for games.Ģ.1 is 2 ordinary speakers (i.e. More speakers never hurt, of course, and you can setup your speaker configuration in software to best suit your personal likes. 5.1 or 6.1 would probably be a bit of a waste-though you might find out that the speakers you like best only come in 5.1 or 6.1 sets. That's just my opinion, though.your mileage may vary. ![]() Now, if ALL you're doing is listening to music, 2.1 is okay, though I personally prefer at least 4.1, which I think provides fuller and more encompassing sound. Newer speakers are coming with DTS remotes and other home theater options. It is also nice for DVD's, since you can enable surround sound like in a home theater. This gives your computer the ability to provide dynamic, realtime 3D positional sound. Obviously, the systems with sattelites are ideal for games, especially when using a sound card that supports EAX or A3D standards. I want to move to space, so I can overclock processors cooled to absolute zero.Ģ.1 is a subwoofer and 2 speakers.4.1 is a woofer, two speakers and two sattelites.5.1 is a woofer, two speakers, two side sattelites and a center-front speaker, etc. I figure every once in a while, I have to get off my butt and actually drive down to Frye's or Best Buy and see, touch, feel, and hear some of these things-so I can then come back home and buy them cheaper at. There are certain things I never buy based on hardware site reviews: monitors, speakers, joysticks, mice, keyboards-pretty much anything that gives any sort of sensory feedback. You may even find that a less expensive set sounds better to you than a more expensive set. If and when I do that, my decision will be almost entirely based on how much money I have to spend, as I always spend as much as I can possibly afford at any given time.Īs far as value is concerned, again I would urge you to go give a listen to some speakers. I have an older Antec 4.1 set, and I like it, though I am thinking of upgrading to a newer 5.1 set. One person doesn't always prefer the same qualities as another person. As far as sound-quality is concerned, you really should try to find someplace that sells the assorted speakers so you can do your own side-by-side comparison.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |